The Implementation of Zoom Meeting Utilization in Improving the Quality of Student Learning

Jungga Ganda Tungga Angkat, Jonggi Ganda Tua Angkat, Theranan Kwadkew

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the implementation of Zoom Meeting utilization in improving the quality of student learning. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a descriptive study design. The subjects of this study include teachers and students involved in the online learning process. Data collection techniques were conducted through observation, interviews, and documentation. The results show that the use of Zoom Meeting can enhance interaction between teachers and students, facilitate direct delivery of learning materials, and provide flexibility in the learning process. In addition, features such as screen sharing, breakout rooms, and recorded sessions support the effectiveness of learning. However, several challenges were identified, including limited internet connectivity and insufficient technological readiness among some students. Therefore, appropriate strategies are needed to optimize the use of Zoom Meeting to continuously improve the quality of learning.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adhasita, N., & Setiawan, H. R. (2026). Pengaruh penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot pada mata pelajaran Akidah Akhlak terhadap peningkatan hasil belajar siswa di MAS Tarbiyah Islamiyah. Al-Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 1–15.

Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. AU Press.

Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596

Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.014

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186

Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Kurnia, D. T., Hasibuan, T. D., Ramadhani, A., & Setiawan, H. R. (2026). Analisis persepsi mahasiswa PAI terhadap penggunaan Quizizz dalam pembelajaran psikologi pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 4(4).

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2014). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Moore, M. G. (2013). Handbook of distance education (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Ranti, S., & Setiawan, H. R. (2026). Strategi guru pendidikan agama Islam dalam mengajarkan doa harian kepada siswa di Tadika Al Fikh Orchard Awani Bangi. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 11(2), 150–169.

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). European Commission.

Sapika, N., Lisa, E., Nabila, S., & Setiawan, H. R. (2026). Analisis tren dan efektivitas penggunaan media pembelajaran digital dalam pendidikan agama Islam: Sebuah studi literatur. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 4(4).

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Setiawan, H. R. (2026). Utilizing technology in Islamic religious education: Opportunities and challenges. Proceeding International Seminar of Islamic Studies, 2089–2098.

Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2




DOI: https://doi.org/10.56114/kitabah.v4i2.13294

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View Kitabah Stats

dok-sk-2023-02-BARCODE-2985529200